Since the Chancellor’s Budget Speech on 21st March, the debate over tax avoidance has been raging across the media, provoking widespread furore from an array of different quarters.
The most recent contribution to the debate came in a typically gruff discussion between John Humphrys and David Cameron himself on BBC’s Today Programme.
However, in a society where having a personal accountant is no longer the domain of the super rich, when does cunning accounting become “aggressive” tax avoidance, and when does this become immoral, let alone illegal?
Amongst those who have received a particularly bad press in recent weeks is Amazon, which is alleged to have avoided taxes on sales of £7.6 billion in the UK, through a registered parent company based in Luxembourg. In the past U2, one of Ireland’s greatest exports, has also received heavy criticism for registering part of their business in Holland, reaching fever pitch with the creation of a website http://www.makebonopaytax.com and protests at Glastonbury.
So does this constitute abuse? After all, our current tax system has in part been designed to enable certain groups and individuals to pay less tax as a means of promoting entrepreneurship and stimulating economic growth – both critical in these post recession times. Take for instance this year’s Budget statement, where George Osborne announced the Government’s intention to give UK video game producers tax breaks to stem the relocation of the industry to Canada. Or indeed ISAs, where many of us place money for the sole purpose of paying less tax.
Alas, the Government’s proposed solution to the problem has proven no less controversial as plans to cap tax reliefs on charitable donations have sparked outrage across the third sector. As proposals currently stand, from 2013 uncapped tax reliefs – including those on charitable donations – are to be capped at £50,000 or 25% of a person’s income, whichever is higher.
The backlash from these moves has been swift and strong and, once again, the Government has had to take a step back and open the plans to further scrutiny. We shall wait to see how the issue plays out in what has been one of the Government’s most difficult months since coming to power.
We are using cookies to give you the best experience on our website.
You can find out more about which cookies we are using or switch them off in settings.
Privacy Overview
This website uses cookies so that we can provide you with the best user experience possible. Cookie information is stored in your browser and performs functions such as recognising you when you return to our website and helping our team to understand which sections of the website you find most interesting and useful.
You can adjust all of your cookie settings by navigating the tabs on the left hand side.
Strictly Necessary Cookies
Strictly Necessary Cookie should be enabled at all times so that we can save your preferences for cookie settings.
If you disable this cookie, we will not be able to save your preferences. This means that every time you visit this website you will need to enable or disable cookies again.
TAX AVOIDANCE – BLACK AND WHITE OR SHADES OF GREY
Ros Trinick
The most recent contribution to the debate came in a typically gruff discussion between John Humphrys and David Cameron himself on BBC’s Today Programme.
However, in a society where having a personal accountant is no longer the domain of the super rich, when does cunning accounting become “aggressive” tax avoidance, and when does this become immoral, let alone illegal?
Amongst those who have received a particularly bad press in recent weeks is Amazon, which is alleged to have avoided taxes on sales of £7.6 billion in the UK, through a registered parent company based in Luxembourg. In the past U2, one of Ireland’s greatest exports, has also received heavy criticism for registering part of their business in Holland, reaching fever pitch with the creation of a website http://www.makebonopaytax.com and protests at Glastonbury.
So does this constitute abuse? After all, our current tax system has in part been designed to enable certain groups and individuals to pay less tax as a means of promoting entrepreneurship and stimulating economic growth – both critical in these post recession times. Take for instance this year’s Budget statement, where George Osborne announced the Government’s intention to give UK video game producers tax breaks to stem the relocation of the industry to Canada. Or indeed ISAs, where many of us place money for the sole purpose of paying less tax.
Alas, the Government’s proposed solution to the problem has proven no less controversial as plans to cap tax reliefs on charitable donations have sparked outrage across the third sector. As proposals currently stand, from 2013 uncapped tax reliefs – including those on charitable donations – are to be capped at £50,000 or 25% of a person’s income, whichever is higher.
The backlash from these moves has been swift and strong and, once again, the Government has had to take a step back and open the plans to further scrutiny. We shall wait to see how the issue plays out in what has been one of the Government’s most difficult months since coming to power.
* This website has subsequently been taken down
Interview analysis: It’s a tough job, but someone’s got to do it
PLMR’s Mo Hussein on BBC Breakfast discussing the latest on Brexit
PLMR’s Mo Hussein discusses Brexit with Kay Burley on Sky News
Share this article