2018 PLMR | Church House 29 Great Smith Street Westminster SW1P 3BL
0207 622 9529 | info@plmr.co.uk | Privacy Policy
This website uses cookies to provide you with the best browsing experience.
Find out more or adjust your settings.
This website uses cookies so that we can provide you with the best user experience possible. Cookie information is stored in your browser and performs functions such as recognising you when you return to our website and helping our team to understand which sections of the website you find most interesting and useful.
You can adjust all of your cookie settings by navigating the tabs on the left hand side.
Strictly Necessary Cookie should be enabled at all times so that we can save your preferences for cookie settings.
If you disable this cookie, we will not be able to save your preferences. This means that every time you visit this website you will need to enable or disable cookies again.
Scotland’s European Future: The Reverse Greenland option
admin
After 62% of Scots voted to remain in the European Union the future of the United Kingdom is in doubt, with the prospect of another Scottish independence referendum being very much “on the table”. Yet Nicola sturgeon has made clear that she is willing to explore all options that would protect Scotland’s European future.
So what are these other options and how tenable would they be?
One possibility that has been suggested has been described as the ‘Reverse Greenland’ model. The Kingdom of Denmark is comprised of Denmark, Greenland and the Faroe Islands. Greenland acceded to the European Union when Denmark joined in 1973. However Greenland left the EU in 1985 after a referendum but still maintained its constitutional relationship with Denmark and the Faroe Islands.
This could perhaps be applied to Scotland but in reverse; whereby the UK would still be part of the EU however the treaties would not apply to the nations that voted to leave.
Although Greenland would serve as a constitutional precedent, the implementation of this option would be a major hurdle for the UK and may ultimately offer little difference from an independent Scotland as an EU member.
Firstly, it would raise difficult constitutional questions. It would be unclear whose authority Scotland would be bound by if the EU passed legislation that is reserved to Westminster. It may be the case that parliament would have to mirror any EU legislation and apply it to Scotland or devolve more powers to Scotland.
Additionally if Scotland were to have access to the single market it would have to continue to allow free movement of people and as result an internal customs border would have to be setup.
The ‘Reverse Greenland’ option may prove to be too untidy and convoluted to be implemented successfully. However, with the untangling of the UK from the EU looking like an equally formidable challenge it may well be just as viable.
Ultimately, with Scotland voting to remain part of the UK and the EU in quick succession any option that would allow both to continue should be fully explored.
Keeping young children engaged with science learning at home
What next for the FE Sector?
PLMR’s Mo Hussein Reviews The Papers on BBC News
Share this article